Kara Alaimo, a communications professor at Fairleigh Dickinson University, has written an article that was published this week in the American Psychological Journal about kids and screen time. Based on a “meta-analysis” of 117 different studies on children younger than eleven-years-old, Alaimo shows that the more time kids spend looking at a screen, the more likely their feelings and actions don’t meet expectations for their stage of development. The more time a child spends with screens, the more likely that child is to experience and express above normal anxiety, depression, hyperactivity, and aggression. You can find the article by clicking here. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“I died to the law so that I might live for God.”  ~Galatians 3:19

By refusing to eat with uncircumcised Christians, the apostle Peter was saying that God’s salvation and the unity of God’s people was based on both grace and faith and circumcision and law. By refusing to worship and fellowship with Christians in other denominations, we’re saying that God’s salvation and the unity of God’s people is based on both grace and faith and interpretation and method.

It has to be one or the other; it can’t be both. This is an either/or; not a both/and.

As a way to be saved, as a way to gain righteousness, Paul writes that he gave up the law in order to live for God (Galatians 3:19). And we can’t go back. The law has been fulfilled in Christ Jesus. The law is history. We’re dead to the law so we can be alive to our God. Being saved by obeying the law and being saved by faith in the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus are mutually exclusive things. It can’t be both. If Peter and Barnabas in Antioch or the Jewish Christians in Galatia are saying that circumcision or any part of the law plays a role in the good news of the Gospel, then they’re making a mockery of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.

Paul knows it’s an either / or, he knows it can’t be both. If he chooses law, he must reject grace. So, he makes his choice crystal clear:

“I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing.” ~Galatians 2:21

We can’t go back. Paul writes that if he goes back to trying to get right with God by means of the law, then he proves he’s a sinner (Galatians 2:18). In other words, if the law is what saves you, then look out! You’ve already broken it!

Do you see why it can’t be both? If the law is the method, then all Christians are sinners. But if the perfect faithfulness of Jesus is the means, then all Christians are righteous. And any behavior or attitude that separates groups of Christians or draws lines of acceptance or fellowship between different kinds of Christians, distorts that good news.

We are not saved by our own merits or works, we’re not saved by being in the right group; we are saved by the faith of Jesus. That was true when Peter was differentiating between Jewish Christians and Gentile Christians back then, and it’s just as true today when we’re differentiating between Church of Christ Christians and Presbyterian Christians and Baptist Christians and Methodist Christians. We are all saved by the exact same thing in the exact same way, but putting our faith in God through Christ.

That means we all belong at the same table. That means we accept all Christians with a different history, different traditions, a different story to tell. And, no, it’s not easy. I’m not saying it is. It’s actually very difficult for us. It’s almost offensive. Because God’s matchless grace totally disregards our human merit, his mercy and love completely breaks down even our socially acceptable barriers and brings together very different kinds of people. That sort of unity is tough to swallow.

Jonah got ticked off at God’s grace because God showed favor to Jonah’s national enemies. The older brother refused to come to the feast because the Father had invited the runaway son. The Pharisee thanks God that he’s not like the tax collector.

But this is God’s way: he unites as he saves and he saves as he unites.

Peace,

Allan